"The Hate is Back."

'The hate is back' say German media as migrant crisis sparks the country's worst spate of political violence since the Nazi era

You know, you've got to smile at the liberal-left's increasingly futile attempt to control the Official Narrative. The insane immigration policies (etc.) of European liberal states, which have led there to a resurgence of the right, means that "hate is back" doncha know.

It's all so laughable when you consider that the lefties have shown themselves to be as just as hateful if not more so than the right, and that the history of leftist vs. rightist states shows that the left's hatred is far more intense, if gauged by the number of people they have murdered compared to that the right (especially when you factor in abortion).

In Europe right now, it's all a sure sign of their desperation and ultimate doom. They are unfit to govern, and an increasing number of Europeans know it.

In 2011, when the demented Anders Brevik went on a killing spree over what he perceived to be the Norweigan sellout to Islam, European traditionalists scrambled to distance themselves from his actions.  However bad things may be, you don't just go out and murder a bunch of benighted politicians and kids, they rightly argued.  But there is a point to be addressed here they said, and one "Shrewsbury", commenting on the traditionalist Lawrence Auster's blog,  made that point eloquently:

Shrewsbury is giving no thought to the political fall-out from the Breivik atrocity, for three reasons, in ascending order of importance:

3. If the liberals want to turn a hundred horrible murders into just more grist for the mill of their squalid politics, he is willing to let them have it.

2. He does not give a rat’s hindquarters what liberals (that is, neo-Leninists) think or say or do about anything. At this point in the dialectic, no dialogue is possible with them. They live in their own universe of lies and depravity.

1. The deeper meaning of this event goes far beyond giving the haircuts on the television news a new rhetorical weapon. It means multiculturalism and mass immigration are now pushing some white people into the same nihilistic psychological space as Muslims, left with nothing but an overwhelming urge to destroy. If the liberals had the wit to understand this, they would be profoundly alarmed. The difference of course is that the Muslim culture is the source of its own despair, while for the European the cause of despair is the forcible ruin and elimination of his culture by others—the left, the Muslims. This means that the European urge to destroy can be slaked by allowing the European to be European, while the Muslim’s urge to destroy can never be slaked, because, to achieve any peace, he must become something other than Muslim.

But at the moment this makes no difference—you have two urges to destroy, with the utterly rotten edifice of liberalism in the middle. And this is what matters, not what Rachel Maddow is babbling tomorrow. We may even find that the liberals’ expressions of hate toward the right become actually less intemperate after this, as they begin to sense the stirrings of the monster which they have done so much to awake, and, having cried wolf a thousand times, now find themselves confronted by a dragon; and begin to realize that all their silly ranting about how awful the Right is will be of no use if they are to be confronted by a Right which really is awful.

This didn’t have to happen, the left didn’t have work so long and so frenziedly to try to destroy us, and everything we are, and everything we have, but they did, so it will happen. It is sickening and it is tragic.

I would highlight Shrewsbury's point that "(a)t this point in the dialectic, no dialogue is possible with (the European liberal-leftists). They live in their own universe of lies and depravity."

Which means that their states no longer enjoy political legitimacy.  Certain things follow from this.

For us Anglicans, I would argue that the time has come to put away this kind of nonsense, and embrace the realism we will all need to avoid civil war in Europe and perhaps here in the Anglosphere.

Lastly, regarding "'hate",  I will conclude with this observation of G.K. Chesterton:

“The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him.”

What is behind us is Christian civilization.  As Bill Bennett once put it, we defend that civilization "because it is good, and it is ours."